Everyone's fingerprint is unique. The pattern of lines and circles on your thumb is not the same as anyone else's. However, similar to fingerprints, footprints are unique to the individual who made them as well. The size, the width, the height of the arch, and the force at which it was made are all aspects that tell us something about the individual. In my opinion footprints tell us more about an individual then a fingerprint. A fingerprint is only useful if there is already information linked to that fingerprint, the fingerprint must already be on file. A footprint on the other hand can tell us something about a person based solely on the information we have in front of us. For example, based on the size and width we can tell roughly about the person's height and build. We can tell if the print was made by a young child or a grown man. If there are multiple prints we can reenact the person's stride. We may be able to tell if the person is pigeon-toed or possible has a limp. Yet, unlike fingerprints footprints do not go on file and are usually not forever. The temporariness of a footprint in the sand before the water washes it away or in the mud before a rainstorm causes us to make sure we give our attention to the footprint before it is lost forever or until another person walks down that same path. A footprint is not art but it deserves our attention nonetheless because it is a representation of something that was there before. It shows the path of something that has already gone ahead and although we may be able to see it now it may not be there when we go looking for it again.
No comments:
Post a Comment